Started By
Message

re: Aereo Loses Copyright Fight

Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:04 pm to
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58128 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Bring on a la carte cable for frick's sake.


I don't know why people don't get this but a la carte cable would be far more expensive in the long run.

If you think you are getting channels like ESPN for less than $100+ a month you are dreaming.

shite, a single PPV SEC game against an FCS school used to run upwards of $50. Now take all the sporting events that are on ESPN and recognize that ESPN would not sell you all that content for cheap.
This post was edited on 6/25/14 at 1:07 pm
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150867 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

I don't know why people don't get this but a la carte cable would be far more expensive in the long run.

Exactly. A la carte cable may eventually happen, but not for a whole IMO. And that depends on if different networks stop teaming up with each other. If a la carte cable happens, not only can you expect out the arse for things like ESPN, but you can kiss smaller channels goodbye since they won't generate enough revenue to stay on the air.
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
22927 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

shite, a single PPV SEC game against an FCS school used to run upwards of $50


What information are you basing this on?
Posted by CajunAlum Tiger Fan
The Great State of Louisiana
Member since Jan 2008
7880 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:44 pm to
ESPN delivers advertising, PPV does not, so that's a terrible comparison.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29428 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

If you think you are getting channels like ESPN for less than $100+ a month you are dreaming.


Why does everyone automatically assume this will happen? In an alacarte model, wouldn't demand dictate the price?
Posted by crash1211
Houma
Member since May 2008
3140 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

If you think you are getting channels like ESPN for less than $100+ a month you are dreaming.

What happens if they start losing revenue because people are unwilling to pay that for ESPN. I'm willing to bet they would lower prices if the subscriber base shrinks too much. Although I would also be willing to bet they stop paying top dollar for sports they cover currently, and we will go back to the days when Getty Oil owned them and we had Australian rules football on all the time.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram