Started By
Message

Aereo Loses Copyright Fight

Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:37 pm
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
22927 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:37 pm
LINK

quote:

Aereo, currently in 11 markets, uses dime-sized antennas to capture over-the-air local TV broadcasts and feed them to users via the Internet. Subscribers pay an $8 monthly fee for the service. For an extra $4, users can get 20 hours of DVR storage, or for $12/month, 60 hours of DVR storage.


Big guys win for now, but they knew they had a threat in the form of Aereo.

ETA: I am a fan of challenging big cables model of paying for channels you don't want. Not necessarily saying I wanted aereo or anything.

Bring on a la carte cable for frick's sake.
This post was edited on 6/25/14 at 12:48 pm
Posted by DirklasDaDirk
St. Martin Parish
Member since Dec 2010
1498 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:39 pm to
Paying for over the air antennea channels is bullshite, glad they lost.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Big guys win for now, but they knew they had a threat in the form of Aereo.


So you're upset simply because "the big guys won?" Sounds like a shitty way to frame your point of view.

quote:

Bring on a la carte cable for frick's sake.


Ahh, so you actually have some semblance of an argument based on the merits.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80459 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Bring on a la carte cable for frick's sake


The only way that would work would be to cap what TV networks can charge per customer. Otherwise, ESPN's fee goes from $5/subscriber to $25/subscriber.
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61581 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Big guys win for now


Is that really the case? One of the potential ramifications I had heard if Aereo won was the Cable companies would see that as license to do the exact same thing and stop paying your local stations to broadcast their stations over cable.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58128 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Bring on a la carte cable for frick's sake.


I don't know why people don't get this but a la carte cable would be far more expensive in the long run.

If you think you are getting channels like ESPN for less than $100+ a month you are dreaming.

shite, a single PPV SEC game against an FCS school used to run upwards of $50. Now take all the sporting events that are on ESPN and recognize that ESPN would not sell you all that content for cheap.
This post was edited on 6/25/14 at 1:07 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram