Started By
Message

re: ACLU: American police becoming excessively militarized

Posted on 6/25/14 at 8:37 am to
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
24272 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 8:37 am to
quote:

A few of the incidents highlighted in the report:

— "In 2010, 7-year-old Aiyana Stanley-Jones was killed when, just after midnight, a SWAT team threw a flashbang grenade through the window into the living room where she was asleep. The flashbang burned her blanket and a member of the SWAT team burst into the house, firing a single shot, which killed her."

— Jose Guerena, a 26-year-old Iraq War veteran, whose wife heard a noise that turned out to be a SWAT team. Guerena "picked up his rifle, with the safety on, and went to investigate. A SWAT team fired 71 shots at Guerena, 22 of which entered his body and killed him."

Among the ACLU's findings:

— 62 percent of SWAT raids were for the purpose of conducting drug searches.

— Just 7 percent of SWAT raids were "for hostages, barricade, or active shooter scenarios."

— SWAT raids are directed disproportionately against people of color — 30 percent of the time the "race of individual people impacted" was black, 11 percent of the time Latino, 20 percent white and 30 percent unknown.

— Armored personnel vehicles that local law enforcement agencies have received through grants from the Department of Homeland Security are most commonly used for drug raids and not school shootings and terrorist situations.

— In cases in which police cited the possible presence of a weapon in the home as a reason for utilizing a SWAT team, weapons were found only 35 percent of the time.


The war on drugs can't end soon enough to get rid of these incentives to raid and confiscate the belongings of private citizens.
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:09 am to
quote:

— 62 percent of SWAT raids were for the purpose of conducting drug searches.

quote:

— In cases in which police cited the possible presence of a weapon in the home as a reason for utilizing a SWAT team, weapons were found only 35 percent of the time.

fricking despicable
This post was edited on 6/25/14 at 9:10 am
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9049 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:21 am to
quote:

— 62 percent of SWAT raids were for the purpose of conducting drug searches.

— Just 7 percent of SWAT raids were "for hostages, barricade, or active shooter scenarios."

— Armored personnel vehicles that local law enforcement agencies have received through grants from the Department of Homeland Security are most commonly used for drug raids and not school shootings and terrorist situations.



Yeah, no shite. When you've got all these new, fancy toys, you gotta justify their existence by utilizing them whenever possible.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 9:25 am to
quote:

— 62 percent of SWAT raids were for the purpose of conducting drug searches.


Anyone else here know an officer who was mowed down by an AK while serving a search warrant?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261485 posts
Posted on 6/25/14 at 11:47 am to
quote:


The war on drugs can't end soon enough to get rid of these incentives to raid and confiscate the belongings of private citizens.


It's kind of interesting how many people seem to agree with this when I have discussions online or IRL, but I guess the subject just attracts those passionate about ending this fiasco. Looks like most Americans are pretty satisfied with the status quo.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram