Started By
Message

re: Should govt. be completely out of the marriage/family business?

Posted on 6/23/14 at 9:25 am to
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67214 posts
Posted on 6/23/14 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Absolutely not. I think it's a good thing that the government encourages a strong family unit.



But they don't. They encourage single mothers to not work and have an ever increasing number of kids out of wedlock because they get more money for each kid and if they work more than a minimum wage job or save their money, they lose their benefits (subsidized housing, free cell phone, free healthcare, food stamps, ect)
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109125 posts
Posted on 6/23/14 at 10:11 am to
quote:

But they don't. They encourage single mothers to not work and have an ever increasing number of kids out of wedlock because they get more money for each kid and if they work more than a minimum wage job or save their money, they lose their benefits (subsidized housing, free cell phone, free healthcare, food stamps, ect)


This is the thing that needs to change. I'd be up for the government paying for the first kid, but if you and your baby's daddy are both on welfare and can't support the kid, then you both receive a complementary sterilization. Could you imagine how much the crime rate would go down over the course of a generation if we implemented this policy? Granted, I'd give a break to couples who have applied for welfare during pregnancy, but that's it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram