re: ISIS.. Iraq, Iran, and the US. Understanding the issues

quote:

---

This guy disagrees with you
quote:
Far from it: direct military intervention by a Western state -- even if Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki is requesting it -- would dramatically worsen the situation, and ISIS, contrary to what pro-interventionists might say, would inevitably come out on top.

---

Then he turns around and says:

quote:

---

But even if it is not our place to carry out military action, this is not to say that military intervention is categorically inappropriate. Indeed, if the Iraqi national army cannot pull itself together, I would argue it is absolutely necessary.

---

Now how do either of those quotes disagree with me?

quote:

---

And this guy

quote:
Eleven years on, western leaders should hang their heads in shame at what they have created. And surely now, Tony Blair must lose his job as envoy for peace in the Middle East.

---

And where's the disagreement?

quote:

---

But this guy agrees with you

quote:
"There is no scenario where we can stop the bleeding in Iraq without American air power," Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told reporters after a closed Armed Services Committee briefing with Defense Department officials

---

Where's the agreement?

quote:

---

Hmmmm considering you've been wrong on everything else, I'm on the other team

---

I'm not going to play this game with VB. Either we have a conversation and you drop the playground antics, or I simply will ignore your posts.