Started By
Message

re: Some ????'s for lefties/greenies/GW supporters

Posted on 6/16/14 at 10:09 am to
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40191 posts
Posted on 6/16/14 at 10:09 am to
quote:

I do. So your question is fricking stupid.


link to your posts supporting that argument

quote:

he paper you cite refers only to Australia and New Zeeland medieval temperatures. Drawing conclusions about the global temperature based solely on records from Australia and New Zeeland is stupid.


the paper provides evidence challenging the notion that the MWP was only a european or northen hemisphere event.
quote:

The "review paper" you cite was not subject to the peer review process and is self-published by its authors and their donors (Exxon). It has the same value as tobacco company scientists claiming tobacco doesn't cause cancer. In fact, the founder of the source website "Co2Science" - Craig Idso - has co-authored publications with tobacco company shill Fred Singer. The big corporations are actually hiring the same people to promote disinformation in vastly different scientific arenas (climate science vs.human biology) - and you guys are sucking it all up just the same.


when you can't attack the info attack the source.
Posted by petar
Miami
Member since May 2009
5989 posts
Posted on 6/16/14 at 11:23 am to
If Miami and/or New Orleans goes under water for human or non human related reasons... Ill be pissed.

that is all.

all other benefits or problems i don't really care about.

Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 6/16/14 at 12:37 pm to
quote:


the paper provides evidence challenging the notion that the MWP was only a european or northen hemisphere event.


Great. It does nothing to establish the MWP was globally warmer. And it was written by complete shills doing fake science.

quote:


when you can't attack the info attack the source.

The authors of the paper didn't see fit to expose it to criticism by the peer review process, so why should I bother? If the very people who wrote it didn't think it would withstand anonymous peer review, clearly it isn't worth spit.

I'm sure you read every word of it yourself. You find a blog saying something you like to hear, it has a link to a paper - and you eagerly click over to read over every word, checking its references, even, right?

This post was edited on 6/16/14 at 12:39 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram