- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woody Jenkins files lawsuit challenging annexation of Mall and Hospital
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:15 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:15 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
None of that would seem to establish Woody's personal standing, though.
In the lawsuit...
quote:
Plaintiff, who is a citizen of Baton Rouge, owns three tracts of land and three houses in Baton Rouge. He pays more than $7,000 a year in property taxes. He resides in a "high crime" area and has recently been a victim of crime and would be particularly affected by any reduction in police or fire protection services...
This post was edited on 6/12/14 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:17 pm to moneyg
quote:
Plaintiff, who is a citizen of Baton Rouge, owns three tracts of land and three houses in Baton Rouge. He pays more than $7,000 a year in property taxes. He resides in a "high crime" area and has recently been a victim of crime and would be particularly affected by any reduction in police or fire protection services...
Well that's mighty freaking tenuous.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:18 pm to moneyg
Under his reasoning, any annexation would reduce the amount of protection currently given. This lawsuit has no legs to stand on.
Posted on 6/12/14 at 12:37 pm to moneyg
quote:
Plaintiff, who is a citizen of Baton Rouge, owns three tracts of land and three houses in Baton Rouge. He pays more than $7,000 a year in property taxes. He resides in a "high crime" area and has recently been a victim of crime and would be particularly affected by any reduction in police or fire protection services...
That's a mighty big stretch for having personal standing. If this is allowed, it could set a dangerous precedent for allowing any number degrees of separation to be considered as personal standing (kinda like Wickard v. Filburn).
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News