Started By
Message

re: Smoking in public proponents - Should we also have the right to drink and drive?

Posted on 6/4/14 at 1:09 pm to
Posted by mizzoukills
Member since Aug 2011
40686 posts
Posted on 6/4/14 at 1:09 pm to
Whose rights are more important: 1) The smoker's right to expose non-smokers to potentially deadly carcinogens, or 2) the non-smoker's right to breathe public air that is free of tobacco smoke?
Posted by burdman
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
20689 posts
Posted on 6/4/14 at 1:11 pm to
If the smokers are outdoors, I don't really see how it affects people around them.

Unless someone is consistently within 2 feet of the smoker which is a pretty unusual circumstance.
Posted by JOJO Hammer
Member since Nov 2010
11927 posts
Posted on 6/4/14 at 1:12 pm to
Air inside of a private business is not public air. Yes the public can go in but the air is for the buildings owner.

And again if you don't want to breath in smoky air don't go to a place that allows smoking. YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE!!!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram