Started By
Message

re: Rand Paul's way-too-early path to the GOP nomination.

Posted on 6/3/14 at 10:18 am to
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119044 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 10:18 am to
quote:

He is also good looking (sad to say this matters)


No doubt.

Good looks started to be a major factor IMO with Kennedy. I wasn't alive, but I have seen the videos of the Nixon/Kennedy debates were there was a close up of Nixon's sweaty upper lip. Some people cite that as the beginning of Nixon's fall against Kennedy albeit Kennedy was a good looking especially compared to Nixon. His good looks probably carried him to victory despite his inexperience.

You can look at every presidential election since Kennedy/Nixon and in general the better looking candidate wins. When I say good looking, good looking also includes charisma.

Reagan had it in spades.
George Bush 1 didn't have it but compared to Dukakis...lol
Clinton had it.
GWB has more than stiff Al Gore and Lurch Kerry.
And of course Obama's had it over McCain and stiff Romney. (It's not that Romney isn't handsome, he's just not cool like Obama).
Posted by DeltaDoc
The Delta
Member since Jan 2008
16089 posts
Posted on 6/3/14 at 10:28 am to
I personally think Huntsman would be a great president. I also personally think he would have roughly a snowflake's chance in hell of beating Hillary or anyone else they ran because he will not excite the base.

I think Rand Paul could not only get the base out, I think he could realistically pull minority votes better than any GOP candidate of the past as well as the cross-over "hipster" vote.

If Paul gets the nod, he represents the best chance for the GOP to take the WH back.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram