Started By
Message

re: LSU 2015 & 2016 Football Recruiting | Commits and Discussion

Posted on 7/15/14 at 10:09 pm to
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
13110 posts
Posted on 7/15/14 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

I'm trying to figure out if carter constitutes a pattern on who Sagan offers early and focuses on in Louisiana. With a few exceptions, it's not guys they have to fight for. With falkins, sims, Charlot, and now carter, it's like they pick the highest rated kid at a position that lsu has already offered a bunch of guys at in state and get in their ear.

It's a working theory, still thinking it out. Do any of you see the same pattern?
It's hard to discern a pattern because of:
- of course both LSU and Bama will be offering many of the same kids
- if not fighting LSU for them, there's likely other SEC teams they will have to fight
- both LSU and Bama like the same depth at some of the same positions (e.g. RB,OT). This will cause them to cross paths.

And then again, I keep thinking Cameron Sims last year. But is that part of a pattern or is it just highlighted because of CRob?

Looking at 247 and offers out by both teams, (# of offers to LA kids):

QB: LSU- 2 (0) Bama- 12 (0)
RB: LSU- 9 (4) Bama- 18 (2)
WR: LSU- 17 (4) Bama- 24 (4)
TE: LSU- 9 (1) Bama- 11 (1)
OT: LSU- 20 (1) Bama- 18 (0)
OL: LSU- 7 (1) Bama- 11 (0)
DE: LSU- 18 (1) Bama- 23 (0)
DL: LSU- 11 (0) Bama- 16 (1)
LB: LSU- 14 (0) Bama- 25 (0)
CB: LSU- 18 (2) Bama- 16 (0)
S: LSU- 12 (2) Bama- 10 (0)
ATH:LSU- 11 (0) Bama- 14 (0)

Totals:
LSU: 143 (16)
Bama: 198 (8)

So on the surface, doesn't look like it. However, have to take into account that compared to the '14 and '16 classes LA is "down" a little. So that may be misleading. But if they were actively doing what you are suggesting I would think we would still see different numbers.

One thing I am seeing in the numbers, that would make the pattern you are considering a good attack strategy, is LSU's preference (not 100% adhered to) to not offer in-state kids unless they for sure will accept the commitment. They avoid turning away in-state, but do not want to miss out on OOS talent. I see that up there; the point in the cycle has much to do with that.

Another thing that may skew these numbers is (and I often forget about this myself), who you offer this year depends just as much on who you plan to offer next year and who committed the year before. Recruit 3 years at a time if you're LSU (or Bama) because of attrition.


Random thoughts (things I noticed looking up numbers):
- LSU has no offer out to TD Moton?
- forgot about him... I really hope LSU pulls in Matt Womack (OT, Hernando MS)
- Damn, Bama really offers the hell out of skill positions.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram