- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: $60M Allen football stadium deemed 'not safe,' will close this season
Posted on 5/20/14 at 11:03 am to AUCE05
Posted on 5/20/14 at 11:03 am to AUCE05
i've worked on lump sum projects where inspections (soils testing, rebar, concrete cylinders, welding, etc.) were payed for by the Owner... we had no part in it (other than coordinating). although they were negotiated contracts, not hard bid projects like the one in question.
no doubt... and maybe the ISD did hire a consultant to act as a manager over the arch/eng/contractor... if they didn't, they should have.
no doubt... and maybe the ISD did hire a consultant to act as a manager over the arch/eng/contractor... if they didn't, they should have.
Posted on 5/20/14 at 11:08 am to lowspark12
quote:
i've worked on lump sum projects where inspections (soils testing, rebar, concrete cylinders, welding, etc.) were payed for by the Owner
Ive done both on Lump Sum projects where the contractor and the owner have paid for this. Ive been in positions where the owner paid a 3rd party and I hired a 4th party, I had the money in the bid, so as to make sure my arse was totally covered. This sounds like a combination of faulty design and poor construction. Ultimately, the contractor will take the hit. Architects and Engineers always manage to escape this kind of blame.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)