re: AGW Deniers - Seems Kind of Hopeless

quote:

---

It would help if you had a clue what a state variable, causality, and which way heat flows.

---

Ohh, I get it, you're one of those dudes that tries to trot out impressive sounding phases and terms as if to boost your authoritative presence and intimidate people into not pushing you. Are you the guy that I fricked up so bad on the "appeal to authority" argument???

YOU ARE ARENT YOU.

Dude your schtick is lame. I fricking use state variables every day. I could declare a state variable with my dick. What I am stating is very simple.

The following assertion was made:

Assertion : Because climate models are inaccurate and include carbon as a force variable, we must therefore declare that carbon cannot be a valid force variable.

This does not hold up to scrutiny because a system of equations involving the climate would involve a large body of variables which are dependent upon each others state. An invalid X input might invalidate the result of this particular model, but does not mean that C doesn't belong in the system or that its value was even incorrect.

So save your bullshite terms and your appeal to authority jive for someone who doesnt know better.

Now Im getting off here and finishing the 4th qtr of this game without thinking bout you frickers.