- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AGW Deniers - Seems Kind of Hopeless
Posted on 5/19/14 at 7:56 pm to stuntman
Posted on 5/19/14 at 7:56 pm to stuntman
quote:
That was me and I stand firmly behind that statement.
Did you see how far off those models were? They were predicated on the hypotheses that CO2 was the main driver of temp increases. I repeat, DID YOU SEE HOW FAR OFF THOSE MODELS WERE?
No it wasn't you. You first brought up the data on models. This comment came much later.
quote:
Again I ask, shouldn't it be YOU who needs to answer this question?
If 97% of scientific literature coming out on the subject of climate science discount the notion of AGW that would be a pretty big deal to me.
1
Posted on 5/19/14 at 8:05 pm to AUbused
quote:
If 97% of scientific literature coming out on the subject of climate science discount the notion of AGW that would be a pretty big deal to me.
Let's start here: Testing hypotheses are a necessary part of science, agree? Global warming advocates' hypotheses are that CO2 creates global warming and has been for decades now, correct? So, can you point me to forecasts based on these hypotheses that have turned out to be correct?
One final question, you would agree that science depends on hypotheses being tested over and over and coming up w/ the same answers time after time, correct?
This post was edited on 5/19/14 at 8:07 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News