Started By
Message

re: AGW Deniers - Seems Kind of Hopeless

Posted on 5/19/14 at 7:51 pm to
Posted by stuntman
Florida
Member since Jan 2013
9141 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

I read his post as stating that models being inaccurate means conclusively carbon is not a driver. That's bad logic.


That was me and I stand firmly behind that statement.

Did you see how far off those models were? They were predicated on the hypotheses that CO2 was the main driver of temp increases. I repeat, DID YOU SEE HOW FAR OFF THOSE MODELS WERE?

quote:

What could change your mind?


Again I ask, shouldn't it be YOU who needs to answer this question?
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7785 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

That was me and I stand firmly behind that statement.

Did you see how far off those models were? They were predicated on the hypotheses that CO2 was the main driver of temp increases. I repeat, DID YOU SEE HOW FAR OFF THOSE MODELS WERE?


No it wasn't you. You first brought up the data on models. This comment came much later.

quote:

Again I ask, shouldn't it be YOU who needs to answer this question?


If 97% of scientific literature coming out on the subject of climate science discount the notion of AGW that would be a pretty big deal to me.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram