Started By
Message

re: AGW Deniers - Seems Kind of Hopeless

Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:42 am to
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7785 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:42 am to
Lol. Im a "scientist" too. A computer scientist

I do find it funny that you are a "scientist" who deals with "climate related projects" yet you responded to my post on carbon cycles by citing carbon concentration.........showing a pretty poor understanding of wtf you were talking about.
Posted by ironsides
Nashville, TN
Member since May 2006
8153 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:54 am to
Ok Aubused, so of that 97% statistic, what was the sample size that was tested? What was the denominator?
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:56 am to
quote:

yet you responded to my post on carbon cycles by citing carbon concentration


because the cycles are meaningless if not under the estimation of the current concentration pools. I find your routine this morning to be tiresome spidey.

back to work.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram