Started By
Message

re: AGW Deniers - Seems Kind of Hopeless

Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:39 am to
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7785 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Did you read the link regarding construct of that claim?


Yes. Of course I could also go find an article that claims leprechauns to be real. I'll let you Google for that one though.

quote:

Do you have a clue as to the significance of cyclical prehistoric CO2 variance?


I know that it has changed in the past significantly. Same with temperature. But as I understand it current science takes that into account and places a large emphasis on carbon trend correlation with the industrial revolution. Also, as I understand it most variances in pre-industrial carbon changes are explainable by natural phenomena(e.g volcanoes etc).

At any rate, I didn't really come here to get into the nitty gritty. Its been 2 years since I seriously read up and I really don't have the time to go down that road again. I was simply thinking about the OP this weekend and found the conclusion interesting.

Its pretty much been confirmed here that even if 100% of scientists were stating the same thing it wouldn't change anyones mind. I don't know exactly what that says but its kind of fricked up.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Of course I could also go find an article that claims leprechauns to be real.


Just look at the facts of the claim.

The survey was sent to over 10,000 scientists. Of those, only the answers from 77 were included in the stat. Do you really think that is an accurate representation of the climate community?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124546 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Did you read the link regarding construct of that claim?


Yes. Of course I could also go find an article that claims leprechauns to be real. I'll let you Google for that one though.
So you did not read the link.
It had nothing to do with AGW "science".

It dealt with an example of the type survey used to establish your 97% "consensus" number. A number you continue to erroneously repeat.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124546 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 10:51 am to
quote:

But as I understand it current science takes that into account
Warmist science ignores it as best it can. For good reason. It establishes CO2 as a temperature correlate rather than cause.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57517 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Yes. Of course I could also go find an article that claims leprechauns to be real. I'll let you Google for that one though.
And you're trying to troll by accusing other of "ignoring evidence". Awesome!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram