re: AGW Deniers - Seems Kind of Hopeless

quote:

---

Did you read the link regarding construct of that claim?

---

Yes. Of course I could also go find an article that claims leprechauns to be real. I'll let you Google for that one though.

quote:

---

Do you have a clue as to the significance of cyclical prehistoric CO2 variance?

---

I know that it has changed in the past significantly. Same with temperature. But as I understand it current science takes that into account and places a large emphasis on carbon trend correlation with the industrial revolution. Also, as I understand it most variances in pre-industrial carbon changes are explainable by natural phenomena(e.g volcanoes etc).

At any rate, I didn't really come here to get into the nitty gritty. Its been 2 years since I seriously read up and I really don't have the time to go down that road again. I was simply thinking about the OP this weekend and found the conclusion interesting.

Its pretty much been confirmed here that even if 100% of scientists were stating the same thing it wouldn't change anyones mind. I don't know exactly what that says but its kind of fricked up.