- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: is there a more communistic law than the "seat belt" law?
Posted on 5/19/14 at 9:11 am to Rickety Cricket
Posted on 5/19/14 at 9:11 am to Rickety Cricket
quote:
It should be a no-pay, no-play deal, like with insurance. You don't have to wear a seatbelt, but you shouldn't get to recover insurance proceeds or sue the other party if you are injured as a result.
this guy gets it.
don't take away the "choice". just let them know the consequences.
Posted on 5/19/14 at 9:14 am to oldcharlie8
quote:
It should be a no-pay, no-play deal, like with insurance. You don't have to wear a seatbelt, but you shouldn't get to recover insurance proceeds or sue the other party if you are injured as a result.
In addition, if no-seat-belt person is in an accident, anyone who walks up or shows up on the scene (police, paramedics, whomever) should be able to say, "oh, forget him, not a priority at all, no seat belt worn" ... and there should be zero consequences.
It does seem rather silly to me that there are states in which motorcycle riders do not have to wear helmets ... yet, there is a seat belt law.
Posted on 5/19/14 at 3:00 pm to oldcharlie8
Do you honestly think the trial lawyers would let this pass, not being able to collect damages from an insurance company for this reason? Never happen, so forget it. Check the stats out: no seat belt, no motor cycle helmet, your chances of being critically injured jump through the roof.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News