Started By
Message

re: is there a more communistic law than the "seat belt" law?

Posted on 5/19/14 at 8:37 am to
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Because when you get maimed for not wearing a seat belt, my money has to take care of your sorry arse.

It should be a no-pay, no-play deal, like with insurance. You don't have to wear a seatbelt, but you shouldn't get to recover insurance proceeds or sue the other party if you are injured as a result.
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55358 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 8:38 am to
How stupid can anybody be not to wear a seat belt? Aren't they mandatory front and back in some states?
Posted by oldcharlie8
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2012
7808 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 9:11 am to
quote:

It should be a no-pay, no-play deal, like with insurance. You don't have to wear a seatbelt, but you shouldn't get to recover insurance proceeds or sue the other party if you are injured as a result.


this guy gets it.

don't take away the "choice". just let them know the consequences.

Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57501 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 11:14 am to
quote:

It should be a no-pay, no-play deal, like with insurance. You don't have to wear a seatbelt, but you shouldn't get to recover insurance proceeds or sue the other party if you are injured as a result.


I feel the same about folk who get injured committing criminal acts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram