- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Politico: Republicans stick with Benghazi cash grab
Posted on 5/8/14 at 8:50 am to CamdenTiger
Posted on 5/8/14 at 8:50 am to CamdenTiger
quote:
and sweep it under the rug.
But there has already been the following:
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence conducted a bipartisan investigation, with interviews of government officials and U.S. personnel on the ground during the attacks, and the review of “thousands of intelligence reports…and internal documents,” including emails, cables, and surveillance videos.
So what did it find? The committee’s 85-page report, released in January 2014, set forth in great detail the facts of the attack. The report concluded that the attack could have been prevented, and it faulted the State Department for failing to increase security. The intelligence community also was singled out for failing to properly assess the risks posed. However, the committee rejected Republican allegations of a political coverup.
and
The Republican-controlled House Armed Services Committee also conducted a comprehensive review of classified and unclassified documents, and interviewed people with relevant information.
The committee’s report, released in February 2014, laid the blame for the attack on White House officials, who failed “to comprehend or ignored the dramatically deteriorating security situation in Libya.” The committee also faulted the State Department for reducing security at the consulate. However, the committee denied assertions that a “stand down” order had been issued to U.S. military personnel not to assist U.S. personnel during the attack.
How many more investigations do you need?
Posted on 5/8/14 at 8:52 am to a want
quote:Before the email showing a violation of the Hatch Act.
However, the committee rejected Republican allegations of a political coverup.
Posted on 5/8/14 at 8:58 am to a want
quote:
How many more investigations do you need?
One more, with subpoena power will do nicely. We owe it to those guys.
Posted on 5/8/14 at 9:04 am to a want
quote:
How many more investigations do you need?
We want an investigation that has ALL of the pertinent (read, incriminating) facts. Obama/Holder/Dems hand over tens of thousands of worthless 'facts' and stall for years in the Courts...in order to withhold the enlightening few. And they, and folk like you, Want, then expect us to be okay with that?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
Consider this post a contract: if Republicans pull this crap when they get in office, I'll call them out to put it ALL on the table too.
This is dangerous stuff. Where does rogue governance stop? "A little leavening, leaveneth the whole lump" (biblical).
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconspank.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconcheers.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)