Started By
Message

re: FFP - Man City and PSG Punishment

Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:45 am to
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125487 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Those clubs became powers in a very very different world and today they have revenue streams that dwarf most other clubs. After a decade of spending their way into that group, Chelsea is just now starting to enjoy the same thing. A club today would not be allowed to join the club though because of these new rules.

You already knew all of this though, you're just being intellectually dishonest.



Um City has been doing it since 2008 and got away with it no problem except the last two years. Them and PSG had plenty of time to catch up.

quote:

bullshite. FFP means less completion for ManU, pure and simple.


We all play by the same rules. Sponsorship deals, players bought and sold, tickets and euro competitions.

quote:

Leeds' issue was debt driven, which nobody has a problem with making rules to prevent. Continuing to hide behind this flawed example shows just how full of shite you are.



They went in debt b/c of crazy spending spree
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84895 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Um City has been doing it since 2008 and got away with it no problem except the last two years. Them and PSG had plenty of time to catch up.


I'm not worried about City or PSG, I'm worried about future competition being stifled.

quote:

We all play by the same rules.


Uh huh

quote:

They went in debt b/c of crazy spending spree


Leeds added debt to the club by financing transfer fees over multiple years and other such tactics. Man City is not doing any of that kind of stuff.
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 9:04 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram