Started By
Message

re: FFP - Man City and PSG Punishment

Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:44 am to
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:44 am to
quote:

This is to keep teams from going under like a Leeds United

I just can't understand this line of thinking. Why shouldn't a club be able to spend however it wants? Is someone else picking up the tab for Leeds failing?

quote:

Sorry but clubs like Man United and Liverpool were not built on rampant uncontrolled spending.

What difference does it make? Why should busybodies get to decide the "right" way to build a club?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125487 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 8:50 am to
quote:

What difference does it make? Why should busybodies get to decide the "right" way to build a club?




B/c how alot of these clubs tie into local european communities, which many on this board don't understand. This isn't like the american franchise model.

When these teams go under of hell even get relegated it has a negative impact on the city and its economy.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84895 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 9:03 am to
quote:

What difference does it make? Why should busybodies get to decide the "right" way to build a club?


Because there are ways you can do it in which a club can become competitive with Manchester United and they can't have that happen any more than it already has.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram