Started By
Message

re: Term or Whole? Insurance

Posted on 4/30/14 at 1:46 pm to
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34912 posts
Posted on 4/30/14 at 1:46 pm to
Why not both?

You don't have to be super wealthy to get WL. Yes, it is more expensive than term, but if you are actually investing the difference, you are paying the same amount anyways.

Now, if you are down to getting your death benefit in term and that is all you can spend, or spending that amount in WL, then go term.

Where did you get the $1M number from? Have you don't an actual death benefit calculation? L30 may be a good choice, but a corresponding term 80 policy may actually be cheaper over the 30 years, I'd have to look at the actual numbers, but jus something else to think about.
Posted by AUtigerNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2011
17107 posts
Posted on 4/30/14 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

You don't have to be super wealthy to get WL


Yea was wondering about this comment. I mean I got it because I was under the impression it could be used as extra income at retirement. That is basically the whole reason why I got it. Is this not smart? I feel like it made sense when the guy was explaining this to me.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram