The only thing that's ridiculous is suggesting that a human being's value is based solely on his or her economic value. And you specifically mentioned costing $1M as a reason to kill someone. So why not be consistent if you're going with the utilitarian rationale? On the Minority Report end, why not kill a second or third grader with a high likelihood of growing up to be an undesirable? A 25 cent bullet is even cheaper than a $300 abortion. And even if a senior citizen paid dues in the past, at some point they might cost more than they produced. Shouldn't you save the money at some point, like if their net cost goes over that magic $1 million mark? It's the same amount out of the public coffers.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by OMLandshark

Member since Apr 2009

109557 posts

Posted on 5/1/14 at 9:45 pm to Bestbank Tiger

You do like jumping to ridiculous conclusions. The kid is born at 3rd grade, so its a bit late for that. But we should prevent these kids from being born in the first place. Sure I wish these people would take the pill and use condoms and at least wait to have kids until they're in their mid-20s, but that's not going to happen. We have to get rid of these degenerates somehow, and we stop it at the womb.

If I ever get in charge and a girl who lives off of government cheese has a kid, I won't force an abortion on her but instead have her tubes tied the second she has the kid, and also give the father a complementary vasectomy as well. And any father that somehow manages to have more than 4 kids with 4 different women instead gets a complementary bullet between their eyes. Watch basically all the problems in our society magically disappear in about 30 years with that policy. The incarceration rates would sharply drop off when we get rid of these unwanted kids and make sure that kids are raised in loving and ready families.

This post was edited on 5/1/14 at 9:46 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board