Started By
Message

re: Is being racist always wrong?

Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:56 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424890 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Every single conquering civilization believed they were superior to others for a variety of reasons.

i mean physically conquering your foes is going to give you a sense of superiority. hell there is a laundry list of "insults" that we can discuss that man has created in this scenario. like eating conquered foes, raping the women/killing children (to end their pure genetic lines), cutting off various holy body parts (to prevent the proper death/ascendance into whatever heaven they believe in), etc

these are all strictly, "i am better than you b/c i am more powerful than you and you don't deserve the respect of common human decencies, because you were so weak".

again, would it have been better to commit good ole genocide instead? racism is terrible, but it's better than how we dealt with conquered foes in previous eras of human history. it's going to end badly for the conquered regardless
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48344 posts
Posted on 4/27/14 at 9:11 am to
My biggest issue with the counterargument is that requires us to ignore everything that happened in the world prior to colonialism and view that era in a vacuum.

Its an argument based in ignorance. The Ancient Egyptians set up an entire system based on ethnicity with four distinct groups - Nubians, Egyptians, Asiatics, and Libyians - and chastised one another based on skin tone. The lighter skinned Egyptians declared the Libyans and Nubians to be the "evil
dark skinned people of Ish."
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram