quote:
Since the beginning of time, groups have warred, conquered, and enslaved one another for some type of gain in resources. The idea that this entire practice was rooted in racism is nonsense to anyone who studies it.

There it is. The whole racism meme is about who gets what, how much...and how/why do they get it.

Egalitarian ideology supposes that the weak should be systematically rewarded by seizing economic affluence from the strong, to equalize affluence/power throughout the classes. Merit or character-based qualifiers, nws.

In effect, reward the weak or even immoral, and punish the strong. Could be calamitous and suicidal. Re, Bundy's "sitting on the porch" commentary.

Is it really true that White genes are "recessive"? What does that mean? Does it mean that in a White/Black union...that Black genes/characteristics will be bio-chemically dominant? It is easily observed that (generally so) that Black genes tend toward more physical aggression; and re "Bell Curve" stats, it's not hard to imagine why. So, it would not be a stretch to suspect or scientifically qualify that such aggression is reflected at the most basic chemical levels. Fascinating.

Regardless, if 'value' and relative 'superiority' are (ideally) measured by MLK's rubric of moral "character" as opposed to raw physical/intellectual power...then a lot of the antipathy and division and self-worth defined by worldly status/affluence...goes away. If not...then the "wailing and gnashing of teeth" game goes on.

IMHO, BOTH will. And the only philosophical explanation for such a paradoxical eventuality, is found in the Quantum Paradigm. Parallel Universes..."many mansions". We become the essence of what we CHOOSE to believe. Fine with me, though I realize that such is utter insanity in the current, general worldview.

What-a-scene!