Started By
Message

re: Jeff Green is "Eminently Available"

Posted on 4/24/14 at 2:01 pm to
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
116326 posts
Posted on 4/24/14 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

I'm having 2nd thoughts on taking Wallace. Wallace is $5 million less than Gordon meaning he'd probably be easier to dump if we end up paying someone to take the contract, which seems somewhat likely at this point.

Ideally you get rid of the bad contract asap, and if Boston would take Gordon and Rivers for Green you do it, but if they'll only do Gordon for Green/Wallace, I think I take that trade.





There's definitely some logic to that, especially if you KNOW that Gordon is going to opt in (which you must assume he will).
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
22830 posts
Posted on 4/24/14 at 2:59 pm to
I know people don't care for Gordon because of his contract; however, he is still a solid player.

Why on earth would adding Wallace be a good idea? He would barely play.
Posted by Pmurda3
Member since Nov 2013
54 posts
Posted on 4/24/14 at 4:24 pm to
I like the initial trade. It is very unlikely we hit in the lottery. We have to be realisitc. We need serious help at the 3/5 position and morrow has proven to provide some minute relief at the 2. I would like to try and get rights to Avery Bradley (who's contract is expiring) if possible by throwing in rivers. Jrue, Jackson, bradley, morrow and Evans sounds like a rather solid backcourt to me. Not to mention green, AD, Anderson, withey in the front court and cap space. I like it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram