- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mary Landrieu Doubles Down on Stupid......
Posted on 4/23/14 at 7:40 am to TJG210
Posted on 4/23/14 at 7:40 am to TJG210
quote:
because the state refuses to expand health care options to the working poor at little to no expense,” Landrieu told me
At best, it costs the State 7.1 billion over the next ten years. That's if the Feds (who can't afford it either) don't change the reimbursement rate. And no one knows what happens at the end on ten years.
That's hardly "little to no costs."
3
Posted on 4/23/14 at 8:13 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
At best, it costs the State 7.1 billion over the next ten years. That's if the Feds (who can't afford it either) don't change the reimbursement rate. And no one knows what happens at the end on ten years
Don't come in here with facts. According to an idiot that post on this board Jindal is killing people. Not because he doesn't want to hamper the state with debt but because he's republican and hates the poor.
Posted on 4/23/14 at 8:19 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
At best, it costs the State 7.1 billion over the next ten years. That's if the Feds (who can't afford it either) don't change the reimbursement rate. And no one knows what happens at the end on ten years.
That's hardly "little to no costs."
Okay, seriously, what is the truth from an objective source? I'm not doubting you, but there are some knowledgeable, non-ideological, observers who suggest that it's stupid for the state to turn down the Medicaid expansion deal. 100% funded by the feds initially, then 90% thereafter.
I'm asking the question honestly. What are the numbers?
Posted on 4/23/14 at 9:08 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
At best, it costs the State 7.1 billion over the next ten years. That's if the Feds (who can't afford it either) don't change the reimbursement rate. And no one knows what happens at the end on ten years.
That's hardly "little to no costs."
Not to mention the personal costs of everyone now having to pay Obamacare taxes.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News