- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Supreme Court & the affirmitive action vote
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:53 pm to ShortyRob
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:53 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Sotomayor
This case involves this last chapter of discrimination: A majority of the Michigan electorate changed the basic rules of the political process in that State in a manner that uniquely disadvantaged racial minorities.
I of course do not mean to suggest that Michigan’s voters acted with anything like the invidious intent of those who historically stymied the rights of racial minorities. But like earlier chapters of political restructuring, the Michigan amendment at issue in this case changed the rules of the political process to the disadvantage of minority members of our society
2
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:16 pm to goldenbadger08
quote:
Sotomayor
If the same standards of review applied to other candidates (eg Robert Bork) had been applied to Sotomayor in her confirmation hearings, she would never have sniffed the Supreme Court. She's a racist for all intents and purposes. She's just a leftist racist, so nobody on the left cares.
What else do you expect from her? This is who she is.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:19 pm to goldenbadger08
quote:
Sotomayor
The weird thing is she wouldn't have needed affirmative action with her academic record. I wonder why she's for it's use when it clearly uses race to determine if someone should get into college or not?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News