- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher
Posted on 4/22/14 at 2:01 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
Posted on 4/22/14 at 2:01 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
No sir, the SCOTUS's rulinb applies to all states. Once the feds allow statehood, they lose their rights to the land.
I mean, I hear you and all, but it simply hasn't happened. Look at the map, how can the government claim all of those lands if they can't?
We're missing a piece of this puzzle.
Apparently Bundy made the same claim, but the courts disagreed with Bundy. Now you're saying they agree with him. Which is it, has the court decided in favor of Bundy and now the federal government is acting outside of the courts' decisions?
Is this another case of the Jacksonian, 'The court has no army to enforce its decision'?
1
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:18 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Nothing ever happens until things get challenged.
The feds are like a bully and people and states fear challenging them because the feds can hit you with the IRS, OSHA, FBI etc. etc. like they did the Tea Paety groups
States can be cut off from federal dollars etc et.
The SCOTUS is clear.
The feds are like a bully and people and states fear challenging them because the feds can hit you with the IRS, OSHA, FBI etc. etc. like they did the Tea Paety groups
States can be cut off from federal dollars etc et.
The SCOTUS is clear.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News