Started By
Message

re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher

Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:28 pm to
Posted by Dick Leverage
In The HizHouse
Member since Nov 2013
9000 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

You simply pass the costs off to the sheriff and other LE. How handy


My point is that aside from property taxes, you are not paying for this service out of pocket. And what do you mean "How Handy"? Is that not their job? Surely you don't think landlords should endeavor to forcefully remove tenants on their own.

quote:

No drama in my life....


Did not assert there is any. I stated that Judges don't care about the drama in the lives of tenants as it pertains to unpaid rent.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

My point is that aside from property taxes, you are not paying for this service out of pocket.

You're going to have to fill me in on to what you're referring. I'm having a hard time seeing the relevance of your point.
quote:

And what do you mean "How Handy"?

I thought you were backing the cost to the gov't out of the total cost to make it look cheaper.

It seems that we're dealing with the gov't as land owner here. The costs to the gov't ARE their costs. It was stated in the thread that these costs exceeded the total amount of back 'rent'. I simply said that it doesn't matter if the costs exceed what is owed when it comes to removing an intransigent tenant. I would pay more than what is owed me to remove a tenant - if I had to. I mean, what's the alternative?

...at least I think that's what you're referring to.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram