Started By
Message

re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher

Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:54 pm to
Posted by Dick Leverage
In The HizHouse
Member since Nov 2013
9000 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 12:54 pm to
Yes against an armed man. Are you paying your own personal militia or something? Where in the eviction process are you expected to remove a person, armed or not, from your property? You file the papers and let the legal system do its job. If he is still refusing to leave, and threatens with armed force, you step aside and let LE do it's job. That costs you nothing except what you have already paid in taxes to fund LE.
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Yes against an armed man. Are you paying your own personal militia or something? Where in the eviction process are you expected to remove a person, armed or not, from your property? You file the papers and let the legal system do its job. If he is still refusing to leave, and threatens with armed force, you step aside and let LE do it's job. That costs you nothing except what you have already paid in taxes to fund LE.

What is your point? Are you disagreeing with my statement that sometimes it's worth more than the back rent to remove an intransigent tenant?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram