re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher

I said:

quote:

---

He's armed and he threatened violence against the gov't before they showed up with the SWAT teams...They told him to remove the cattle. He refused. they told him if he didn't remove the cattle, they would. He threatened violence if they tried it. They came in with overwhelming force to execute the removal of the cattle - and then backed down. I don't see the government acting wrongfully here.

---

Then you said:

quote:

---

But why show up with SWAT teams?

The dude obviously leaves the property to go to the local store or whatnot. Apprehend him when he is by himself.

---

Then I said:

quote:

---

They don't want to apprehend him, they want to remove his cattle from public lands.

---

Then you said:

quote:

---

so now the story changes? I thought they wanted to apprehend the cattle

[if you thought they wanted to apprehend the cattle, as you clearly state here, why did you state above, "Apprehend him when he is by himself."?]

---

Then I said:

quote:

---

They want to remove the cattle from public lands...They do NOT want to apprehend Bundy personally

---

Then you said:

quote:

---

For fricks sake, its impossible to have an honest debate with you... You change what you are talking about, spin statements, and otherwise ignore anything that doesn't go into your narrative.

---

It looks to me like I've been consistent in claiming that the feds want to remove the cattle from public lands and that I don't believe they want to apprehend Bundy. I have repeatedly stated this. Can you please indicate in the above exchange where you think I'm being dishonest or inconsistent? tia