- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: US Navy 'game-changer': converting seawater into fuel
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:30 pm to Bard
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:30 pm to Bard
quote:
The real game-changer is when that hits the civilian market. Within 50 years the Middle East will be fairly irrelevant.
Do you think this is the first alternative fuel?
The first Model T was built to run on an easily renewable resource.
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:47 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
The Model T was built to run on easily renewable resources
Like what?Ethynol?You have to be kidding to call it
a renewable source when it actually cost more fuel than it produces.
Good lord the reason gasoline works is because it's the most efficiant way to power an automobile.Don't ya think for one second if there was a better alternative someone would've
marketed or produced it?
Posted on 4/8/14 at 4:50 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
The first Model T was built to run on an easily renewable resource
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Man, you can fck up a thread on any subject around here.
Posted on 4/8/14 at 6:50 pm to Sleeping Tiger
The article was misleading, the true objective is to use energy available from a ships reactor to produce jet fuel for planes eliminating the need to carry large stores of jet fuel on carriers.
Hydrogen is a energy carrier, not a energy source just like a battery. The amount of energy required to break down the molecular bonds in seawater will always be greater than the energy produced by this process, the laws of physics are still in place as will our gas pumps in 20 years.
Better article
LINK
"But to make a jet fuel that is properly "green", the energy-intensive electrolysis that produces the hydrogen will need to use a carbon-neutral energy source; and the complex multi-step process will always consume significantly more energy than the fuel it produces could yield. In addition, each step in the process is likely to add cost and problems."
Hydrogen is a energy carrier, not a energy source just like a battery. The amount of energy required to break down the molecular bonds in seawater will always be greater than the energy produced by this process, the laws of physics are still in place as will our gas pumps in 20 years.
Better article
LINK
"But to make a jet fuel that is properly "green", the energy-intensive electrolysis that produces the hydrogen will need to use a carbon-neutral energy source; and the complex multi-step process will always consume significantly more energy than the fuel it produces could yield. In addition, each step in the process is likely to add cost and problems."
This post was edited on 4/8/14 at 6:58 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)