Started By
Message

re: Gender gap in White House pay draws scrutiny.

Posted on 4/8/14 at 9:41 am to
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61349 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 9:41 am to
quote:

That's only "slightly" better? 88 is nearly halfway from 77 to 100! That kind stretches the definition of the word "slightly" doesn't it?
Good Lord, is there ANYTHING Obama does that you wont shill for, make excuses for, or try to spin?

Why aren't the women making 100% of what the men in the White House make? Why is anything less than that acceptable?
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 4/8/14 at 9:51 am to
As thomas sowell points out, you can explain away some of the discrepency by looking at what positions women fill. In the case of the white house, our beloved jay carney points out
quote:


Jay Carney, the president’s press secretary, said the statistics for White House staff members reflect the fact that women fill more lower-level positions than men. But he said that women and men in the same positions at the White House are paid the same, and that many of the women hold senior positions.

“Men and women in equivalent roles here earn equivalent salaries,” Mr. Carney said. “Some of the most senior positions in the White House are filled by women, including national security adviser, homeland security adviser, White House counsel, communications director, senior adviser, deputy chief of staff.”

He said that the 88-cent statistic was misleading because it aggregates the salaries of White House staff members at all levels, including the lowest levels, where women outnumber men.


I completely buy this. Women are much more likely to be AA than men, and in general those are paid at a lower rate than say cabinet secretary.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram