Started By
Message

re: Draft Needs

Posted on 4/7/14 at 9:44 am to
Posted by Seeker
Member since Jul 2011
1846 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 9:44 am to
He is a solid #2, but a really good #3. If we need him to play as our #2 WR this year, we would be OK, but IMO we would be much better with a legit #1 to bump Colston to #2 (for the short term) and have Stills be our #3. Throw Graham into the mix and that is a pretty good receiving corps.
Posted by Rand AlThor
Member since Jan 2014
9472 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 9:50 am to
quote:

with a legit #1 to bump Colston to #2


I doubt this happens. Not many rookie receivers make an impact in the NFL. We can bring a guy in who can get snaps on the outside and prepare himself to be the guy in the future, but short of trading up for Watkins I don't think there is any scenario where we draft a guy and he instantly steps in as our #1
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
32991 posts
Posted on 4/7/14 at 10:16 am to
quote:

IMO we would be much better with a legit #1 to bump Colston to #2 (for the short term) and have Stills be our #3.


Graham is our #1.
Colston is our #2.
Stills is our #3 now that Moore is gone.


If anything, we need a receiver out of the backfield (a la Bush/Sproles).
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram