Started By
Message

re: k

Posted on 4/5/14 at 6:36 pm to
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19239 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 6:36 pm to
Well, in theory no. But no one has an unlimited bankroll, and if you have a huge bankroll, you probably don't care about profiting only the starting bet, which is what you end up winning each time you win.

Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17279 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 6:39 pm to
I fully agree on the second part of your statement, but how would it matter the % of times the bet wins if it pays 2:1?


ETA: never mind, I re-read
This post was edited on 4/5/14 at 6:40 pm
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 4/5/14 at 7:02 pm to
Blackjack has always fascinated me as it is played in the casino.

The dealer may be playing 5 people but essentially it is one on one. The dealer has to sit on a 17 so essentially it would seem that the player would have the advantage.

I'm assuming the house has the advantage with multiple players against the dealer as the dealer only needs to beat the majority of the table to win.

Would the house have any advantage if blackjack tables only had one chair?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram