- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Questions about federal government pay
Posted on 4/4/14 at 10:20 am to navy
Posted on 4/4/14 at 10:20 am to navy
quote:
Yeah, well you don't see jack shite on this board or anywhere about these people getting a raise. In fact, all you see is people wanting to cut the DoD.
Nothing is beyond cutting. There is plenty of fraud, waste and abuse in DoD, particularly in the procurement system. However, I am all for keeping benefits as generous as possible for our men and women in uniform (full disclosure, I am one of those men and women).
quote:
If Federal Workers don't like the pay ... then don't fricking apply for the job. It's not like the pay isn't well known beforehand.
I don't disagree with this. However, with the pay freeze (3 years), furloughs (for which they were given back pay), it does take a certain amount of dedication to work for the federal government. (full disclosure, I work for the federal government).
quote:
On the board right now ... threads about Congressmen whining about $175K per year. BOO frickING HOO.
I'm torn on Congressional pay - on the one hand, I want to pay them $1,000,000 a year and make it the death penalty for corruption.
On the other hand, I don't care so much about their compensation (and they do get to set it) - but, I would like 2 changes:
1. They don't get the pay raise until they face the voters again - in other words, vote for your raise, but you have to be re-elected to get it, &
2. It will take a constitutional amendment, but Congress should be REQUIRED to be affected by their own legislation. They should be, at best, in an identical position as any other federal worker from a standpoint of compensation, healthcare, retirement, benefits, etc.
The argument is that - the less you pay them, the more corrupt they would be.
I can't see how that's even possible.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News