Started By
Message

re: History Debate: Ulysses S. Grant vs. Robert E. Lee

Posted on 4/1/14 at 8:07 am to
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36330 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 8:07 am to
quote:

Are you telling me that you believe that the former slaves were better off after a devastating war, the south with no economy to speak of, facing reconstruction the effects of which are still being felt today. vs The south freeing slaves and assimilating them into society. A difficult but not unprecedented move


I'm telling you nothing, I was asking you a question which you seem unable to answer.

The South went to war to keep their way of life, and the status quo. They believed in states rights, and that included slavery.

I don't believe the South left alone would have quickly given up slavery despite what you think.

But say they had, do you think they would have just told their former slaves goodbye, and wished them well?

Certainly the ex slaves faced a rough go after reconstruction, but nothing I've seen or read tells me it wasn't going to be any different for the slaves no matter what.
This post was edited on 4/1/14 at 8:59 am
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64565 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 8:49 am to
quote:

I've seen or read tells me it wasn't going to be any different for the salves no matter what.


Would have to agree.

The South was a top heavy stagnant economy. With the wealth so extremely concentrated in such few hands I believe its folly to in any way suggest that these slave holding titans would just see the errors of their ways and give up the ship.

It went the way it did because thats how it worked out.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram