Started By
Message

re: History Debate: Ulysses S. Grant vs. Robert E. Lee

Posted on 4/1/14 at 6:23 am to
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57455 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 6:23 am to
quote:

What's bizarre is anyone understating it.


I don't think he is understating it personally. I think he is trying to discuss slavery more from an 1860's mentality.

While it's true many people viewed slavery as evil then, even those who viewed it as evil probably did not view it as negatively as we do today. We are a generation raised and conditioned to think and feel this way.

Leading up to the 1860's, slavery was a commonplace institution throughout the world. Think of it this way:

How would a white plantation owner who owned slaves have been treated in public in the 1830's? How would a white corporate exec be treated if he owned 50 black slaves today by comparison?

The discussion of societal impacts of slavery before the war eventually gets bogged down in issues of perspective. How we feel about slavery today doesn't have much bearing on discussing how people reacted to slavery 170 years ago.
This post was edited on 4/1/14 at 6:25 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 4/1/14 at 7:32 am to
There were many people, both North and South, who didn't want to see an immediate end to slavery because they were afraid 4 million people flooding the job market, willing to work for cheap, would threaten their jobs.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram