- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Remember that girl in Mass. that was taken from her parents by the state?
Posted on 3/27/14 at 3:00 pm to onmymedicalgrind
Posted on 3/27/14 at 3:00 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Again, like I mentioned in an earlier post, if a dr suspects child abuse/maltreatment of some kind
You are being very loose in your language. Maltreatment is not equivalent to accepting a diagnosis...especially when the patient has received a different diagnosis from a qualified respected physician.
quote:
A few days later, state workers gave the Pelletiers a “service plan” that spelled out in writing what they would need to do to for the agency to consider returning Justina to their custody. Although the parents continued to reject Children’s doctors’ new psychiatric diagnosis for their daughter, the service plan made it clear that they would have to change if they wanted her back. “Parents must acknowledge and demonstrate an understanding of Justina’s medical and psychiatric needs as well as her emotional needs,” the document stipulated, “including an understanding of her diagnosis of somatoform disorder.”
It really seems like the state is indicating that the "abuse" is simply a rejection of the diagnosis. That seems to be the terms for returning the child back to the parents' custody.
Posted on 3/27/14 at 3:13 pm to moneyg
quote:
You are being very loose in your language. Maltreatment is not equivalent to accepting a diagnosis...especially when the patient has received a different diagnosis from a qualified respected physician.
We are obviously having a disconnect here. I've already stated that if what the parents are saying is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, than this is really F'd up and the doctors at BCH should face the full extent of the law.
I just have a feeling we are missing some info here, which is why I'm not ready to go crazy quite yet.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News