Started By
Message

re: Interesting tidbits from the Hobby Lobby/Conestoga Wood oral argument

Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:46 am to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42747 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:46 am to
quote:

arguments were completely based on rhetoric and propaganda - there was no constitutional analysis whatsoever that I have seen from either one of them.

Obama has left a swath of destruction in his wake at every turn - these two in the long run may prove to be the most damaging component of his tenure.

Which is my number one strategic concern.

This is why I can confidently argue that the 'GOP is just as bad as the DEMs' falls flat on its face.

While individual points can be argued - and I suggest that the GOP is slightly better than the DEM in any significant debate - there is no doubt that ANY GOP POTUS would select a better quality of SCOTUS nominee.

And two more DEM appointees to the SCOTUS will permanently destroy the constitution. You might as well allow the constitution to be rewritten every week by another fifth grade inner school class on a field trip to Baskin Robbins.
Posted by Chappy
G-Town
Member since Jul 2007
3407 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:55 am to
If a man doesn't like the plan offered by his employer, he just gets coverage somewhere else, such as his own individual plan


Why can't women do the same?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram