Started By
Message

re: any florida players suspended for this weekend after brawl w/ FSU?

Posted on 3/26/14 at 1:09 pm to
Posted by ThePostman
Member since Sep 2009
2049 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

It was already misplayed before the collision. I don't see the issue here.


First off, this is a judgement call so thats going to be the only grey area to this.

The chalk line is considered fair territory. Runners interference occurs when a runner interferes with a fielder making an attempt on the ball. There doesn't need to be collision, and it doesn't necessarily matter if collision occurs after the interference. When the batter-runner is running to first and veers inside the baseline or even stays outside but makes a step toward the fielders, it should be ruled that he is interfering if the fielder doesn't field the ball. The runner must yield or adjust his path to give room to a fielder.

They should have called the batter-runner out and advanced any runners in a force position on the bases by one base. The blame for no call is on the home plate umpire because he is the only person looking directly at the back of the runner to see his path clearly. However, given that the firstbaseman approached the runner and a conflict ensued, it's understandable that the umpires got caught up in the more urgent issue of separating everyone.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85242 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 1:16 pm to
How did he interfere with the pitcher making the play if the pitching misplayed it prior to any contact? The pitcher wasn't aware of where he was at the time the play should have been made. Two feet this way or that didnt make a difference to him facing his glove the wrong way.

So it's "judgement" then you say things like "should have" and "blame".
Posted by AstroTiger
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Oct 2007
22966 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

The chalk line is considered fair territory. Runners interference occurs when a runner interferes with a fielder making an attempt on the ball. There doesn't need to be collision, and it doesn't necessarily matter if collision occurs after the interference. When the batter-runner is running to first and veers inside the baseline or even stays outside but makes a step toward the fielders, it should be ruled that he is interfering if the fielder doesn't field the ball. The runner must yield or adjust his path to give room to a fielder.


exactly

quote:

They should have called the batter-runner out and advanced any runners in a force position on the bases by one base.


batter-runner should be out yes, but the other runners would be returned to the last legally occupied base.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram