- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The latest from the EBRPSS fiasco-school board meeting last night
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:10 pm to LSURussian
Posted on 3/21/14 at 9:10 pm to LSURussian
quote:
LSURussian
quote:
I have. Rule #1 is to never allow someone to audit their own work or any work they are responsible for.
So Taylor shouldn't have a unit or Section dedicated to auditing and/or QC/QA because of Rule #1, since he is ultimately responsible for the system as a whole-which would include such a unit or Section-based on your experience auditing?
I've done a wee bit of auditing and fraud investigations myself. Tell me more...
1
Posted on 3/21/14 at 11:09 pm to GFunk
quote:If that's true, and I doubt it is based on your ignorant comments in your last post, you would know an internal audit manager should report directly to the board and only indirectly up through the line management.
I've done a wee bit of auditing and fraud investigations myself. Tell me more...
If that is not feasible, then the internal audit manager must have direct access to the board or audit committee of the board without having to go through the line management and without the line management present when audit results are presented to the board or the board's audit committee.
If you didn't have that access in your "wee bit of auditing" then you weren't an auditor. You were an audit clerk.
This post was edited on 3/21/14 at 11:10 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News