- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Desean Jackson - Should We?
Posted on 3/20/14 at 2:53 pm to SouthMSReb
Posted on 3/20/14 at 2:53 pm to SouthMSReb
Hell No! Way too much money...Problems in locker room that we don't need!
This post was edited on 3/20/14 at 2:56 pm
0
Posted on 3/20/14 at 3:07 pm to JPLIII
quote:We are on teh same wavelength.
Still have to deal with his contract. But hell yea, I'd take him.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 3:12 pm to The Sad Banana
duh
Posted on 3/20/14 at 4:55 pm to SouthMSReb
A wide receiver that actually separates and scares defense? I would love it. Don't see it happening with so little cap room though.
Posted on 3/20/14 at 5:01 pm to alajones
Yea I can understand the money part, but we don't need? Da fuq? He's exactly the type of player we need
Posted on 3/20/14 at 5:06 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
but we don't need? Da fuq?
yea I don't get some people's thoughts on here.
Who gives a shite if he's arrogant?
Can he catch passes and out run virtually every NFL DB? Yes.
Want.
Posted on 3/23/14 at 10:03 pm to htran90
quote:
no.
1. he costs too much
2. every season he holds out for a new contract
3. bad attitude
4. going to cost us a 2nd/3rd which I can get a rookie receiver on a rookie contract.
^^^ that and Brees makes receivers. an elite QB can make anyone good. if there is anything everyone should agree on its that sentence.
the following should send fruit baskets to Brees:
Bushrod (to chi)
Nicks (to tb)
Strief (back to saints)
De La Puenta (to happen soon)
Colston (back to saints)
Jimmy (back to saints)
Meachem (to sandy)
Lance (to saints now pitt)
...this list could go on even with other ELITE QBs (not matt ryan, joe flacco, and other espn "elite")
Brady Rodgers Brees Peyton... end of story
Posted on 3/24/14 at 9:29 am to MauriceCheeksJr
So why didn't Brees make the receivers this year look good?
Posted on 3/24/14 at 9:41 am to SouthMSReb
I started posting here cause I didn't think it was full of idiots like SR. I'm wrong about that.
Posted on 3/24/14 at 2:13 pm to TigerBait1127
2013 =
#2 passing team
1 receiver over 1,200 yards
2 receivers over 900 yards
4 receivers over 600 yards (1 of which is a RB in sproles)
2 RBs with 500 yards receiving
Meachem with 324 receiving yards, that 324 more than he would have anywhere else
Jimmy 16 TDs
Colston & stills with 5
10 different players caught a TD
The only teams you'll find similar OR greater numbers: Denver, ...that's it. Ya you'll find a duo of receivers in Chicago with 1,000+ yards and you may find a team with someone 10+ TDs. But what's the difference between #2 passing offense and #1? Playing the raiders twice? Hahaha Desean Jackson isn't the difference in being "better" offensively. It would be wild to see him on our offense, but not for that price.
#2 passing team
1 receiver over 1,200 yards
2 receivers over 900 yards
4 receivers over 600 yards (1 of which is a RB in sproles)
2 RBs with 500 yards receiving
Meachem with 324 receiving yards, that 324 more than he would have anywhere else
Jimmy 16 TDs
Colston & stills with 5
10 different players caught a TD
The only teams you'll find similar OR greater numbers: Denver, ...that's it. Ya you'll find a duo of receivers in Chicago with 1,000+ yards and you may find a team with someone 10+ TDs. But what's the difference between #2 passing offense and #1? Playing the raiders twice? Hahaha Desean Jackson isn't the difference in being "better" offensively. It would be wild to see him on our offense, but not for that price.
Posted on 3/24/14 at 2:32 pm to SouthMSReb
These "Should we?" threads are a little goofy. Here's a guy, Jackson, who makes over $10M a year and constantly wants more and we are strapped for cap space. What's the point?
Posted on 3/24/14 at 3:08 pm to adono
quote:
These "Should we?" threads are a little goofy. Here's a guy, Jackson, who makes over $10M a year and constantly wants more and we are strapped for cap space. What's the point?
They do it for the responses aka free entertainment
Posted on 3/24/14 at 3:46 pm to MauriceCheeksJr
I would love to have him, he's exactly the type of player that I suspect the Saints are hoping to draft.
That being said, we don't have the cap space to afford his contract.
That being said, we don't have the cap space to afford his contract.
Posted on 3/24/14 at 3:50 pm to adono
Heaven forbid we have a conversation about the Saints in the offseason...
Posted on 3/24/14 at 3:50 pm to NawlinsTiger9
I think they're about to cut him though
Posted on 3/24/14 at 3:52 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Popular belief has us taking a WR within the first 3 rounds. Maurice thinks it will happen in the 2nd or 3rd round. Loomis & Payton will be playing Flappy Bird in the war room and see a WR drop our pick in the 2nd or 3rd that they had higher grades on and sprint to the podium Markell Gregoire style
Posted on 3/24/14 at 5:04 pm to MauriceCheeksJr
quote:
Popular belief has us taking a WR within the first 3 rounds. Maurice thinks it will happen in the 2nd or 3rd round
Posted on 3/24/14 at 9:04 pm to goatmilker
Now that they are saying they will cut him we might be able to do a back loaded contract, which i would be down for.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 1:08 am to heytigerfans
He would give colston and graham more room to operate. He'd probably be the most dangerous receiver in the league with brees. His contract sucks, but this would make the saints the top offense in the league next year.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 1:19 am to rubberneck
quote:
I started posting here cause I didn't think it was full of idiots like SR. I'm wrong about that.
That some funny shite right there. Would make a great sig quote for the ST.
Anyway back on topic, if the iggles were to cut him and we could sign him to a team friendly deal, then I would be all for it. Hell I bet he would do a one year deal for a chance at a ring.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News