- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: And Then There Were 3 (Draft Talk)
Posted on 3/17/14 at 9:17 am to GeauxAggie972
Posted on 3/17/14 at 9:17 am to GeauxAggie972
I think C is still a pretty big hole. Lelito could fill it, but I don't think it would surprise anyone if we took the best c available in the 2nd or 3rd.
Sorry, just realized you meant 1st only.
I think the absolute only way we go LB is if someone like Mosely falls. Otherwise I honestly think we just go best WR/CB available depending on the best value.
Sorry, just realized you meant 1st only.
I think the absolute only way we go LB is if someone like Mosely falls. Otherwise I honestly think we just go best WR/CB available depending on the best value.
This post was edited on 3/17/14 at 9:20 am
1
Posted on 3/17/14 at 9:20 am to Brettesaurus Rex
I agree - I consider C a need aswell. Fortunately I think it shouldn't be too hard to nab one in the draft.
IMO
1. CB/LB
2. WR
3. C
4. CB/LB
I only want a LB if he has coverage skills.. We're fine on pass rushers IMO
IMO
1. CB/LB
2. WR
3. C
4. CB/LB
I only want a LB if he has coverage skills.. We're fine on pass rushers IMO
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News