Started By
Message
locked post

using natural gas to hurt russia

Posted on 3/5/14 at 8:29 am
Posted by willthezombie
the graveyard
Member since Dec 2013
1546 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 8:29 am
quote:

One immediate step the president can and should take is to dramatically expedite the approval of U.S. exports of natural gas,” House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, said today in a statement.


quote:

“Having more of our gas reach the market will reduce volatility and provide diversity,” Karen Harbert, president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s 21st Century Energy Institute, told reporters today on a conference call. The institute released a report citing Ukraine has having the least energy security among the top 25 energy-consuming nations.

American companies need the U.S. Energy Department’s permission to export liquefied natural gas to countries that lack a free-trade agreement with the U.S., such as those in the European Union. LNG-export projects also need to pass a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission environmental and safety review.

The Energy Department is weighing approval of at least 24 applications from companies including Cheniere Energy Inc. (LNG) and Kinder Morgan Inc. (KMI) to export the liquefied version of the fuel in tankers after approving six applications since 2010, including five within the past year.


well that just makes too much sense for our government to actually do it. It weakens russia, helps a potential new ally in ukraine and helps our economy. Am I wrong?
LINK
SIAP


Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423793 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Cheniere Energy Inc.

Posted by Holden Caulfield
Hanging with J.D.
Member since May 2008
8308 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 8:32 am to
Obama more likely to provide funding for Solyndra's new Ukrainian plant.
Posted by Layabout
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
11082 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 8:43 am to
If Ukraine is having trouble paying its bill for cheap natural gas from Russia, how is it going to pay for LNG shipped halfway around the world?

Second, there is no LNG terminal in Ukraine. Construction was to have started this year with completion in 2018. Even then it will have a capacity to supply less than 30% of Ukraine's needs.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119044 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 9:00 am to
It only makes sense if LNG exports to Eastern Europe are cheaper that what Putin can sell his natural gas for. I estimate that price to be around $8 per MMbtu. I believe Japan is currently paying -$8/MMbtu for U.S. LNG. Or, Eastern Europe may be willing to pay a premium for western supplies of NG just to hurt Russia. Russia is probably selling to Eastern Europe at current prices: -$4.7/MMbtu. $3.3/MMbtu is a heafty premium. I seriously doubt they are willing to pay that premium.


But it's a good excuse to get more LNG plants online.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54753 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 9:56 am to
Permits aren't the hold up at this point....none of these facilities will be ready before 2016. So I agree with the general argument that putting US gas on the world market would provide more energy security and independence for the world, however, it will not affect on current events. Even if the permits were in place - no affect.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram