- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
using natural gas to hurt russia
Posted on 3/5/14 at 8:29 am
Posted on 3/5/14 at 8:29 am
quote:
One immediate step the president can and should take is to dramatically expedite the approval of U.S. exports of natural gas,” House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, said today in a statement.
quote:
“Having more of our gas reach the market will reduce volatility and provide diversity,” Karen Harbert, president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s 21st Century Energy Institute, told reporters today on a conference call. The institute released a report citing Ukraine has having the least energy security among the top 25 energy-consuming nations.
American companies need the U.S. Energy Department’s permission to export liquefied natural gas to countries that lack a free-trade agreement with the U.S., such as those in the European Union. LNG-export projects also need to pass a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission environmental and safety review.
The Energy Department is weighing approval of at least 24 applications from companies including Cheniere Energy Inc. (LNG) and Kinder Morgan Inc. (KMI) to export the liquefied version of the fuel in tankers after approving six applications since 2010, including five within the past year.
well that just makes too much sense for our government to actually do it. It weakens russia, helps a potential new ally in ukraine and helps our economy. Am I wrong?
LINK
SIAP
Posted on 3/5/14 at 8:30 am to willthezombie
quote:
Cheniere Energy Inc.
Posted on 3/5/14 at 8:32 am to willthezombie
Obama more likely to provide funding for Solyndra's new Ukrainian plant.
Posted on 3/5/14 at 8:43 am to willthezombie
If Ukraine is having trouble paying its bill for cheap natural gas from Russia, how is it going to pay for LNG shipped halfway around the world?
Second, there is no LNG terminal in Ukraine. Construction was to have started this year with completion in 2018. Even then it will have a capacity to supply less than 30% of Ukraine's needs.
Second, there is no LNG terminal in Ukraine. Construction was to have started this year with completion in 2018. Even then it will have a capacity to supply less than 30% of Ukraine's needs.
Posted on 3/5/14 at 9:00 am to willthezombie
It only makes sense if LNG exports to Eastern Europe are cheaper that what Putin can sell his natural gas for. I estimate that price to be around $8 per MMbtu. I believe Japan is currently paying -$8/MMbtu for U.S. LNG. Or, Eastern Europe may be willing to pay a premium for western supplies of NG just to hurt Russia. Russia is probably selling to Eastern Europe at current prices: -$4.7/MMbtu. $3.3/MMbtu is a heafty premium. I seriously doubt they are willing to pay that premium.
But it's a good excuse to get more LNG plants online.
But it's a good excuse to get more LNG plants online.
Posted on 3/5/14 at 9:56 am to willthezombie
Permits aren't the hold up at this point....none of these facilities will be ready before 2016. So I agree with the general argument that putting US gas on the world market would provide more energy security and independence for the world, however, it will not affect on current events. Even if the permits were in place - no affect.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News