Started By
Message

re: Why Leo didn't win, and may not any time soon

Posted on 3/4/14 at 6:53 pm to
Posted by joeytiger
Muh Mom's House
Member since Jul 2012
6037 posts
Posted on 3/4/14 at 6:53 pm to
Why? Because I don't agree with you, or because I have my own opinion. I'm not against people with AIDS or gays, but if you cannot see Hollywoods agenda, then maybe you are stupid. If you look at the two performances objectively, clearly Leo was better that MM.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
32484 posts
Posted on 3/4/14 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

If you look at the two performances objectively, clearly Leo was better that MM.



I don't think you are looking at anything objectively
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
11815 posts
Posted on 3/4/14 at 7:21 pm to
quote:

If you look at the two performances objectively, clearly Leo was better that MM.

Actually, no, he wasn't.
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 3/4/14 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

If you look at the two performances objectively
I have.
quote:

clearly Leo was better that MM.
Clearly, IMO, that is wrong. And it's not even close.
Posted by jg8623
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
13531 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 1:29 am to
quote:

clearly Leo was better that MM


Not really
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38413 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 6:23 am to
quote:

If you look at the two performances objectively, clearly Leo was better that MM




What?!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram