- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 70% of Young Americans think we should be allowed to own Assualt Rifles
Posted on 3/7/14 at 8:40 am to Clames
Posted on 3/7/14 at 8:40 am to Clames
quote:
Simple math is hard for some.
Wait a minute, you provide a list of all sorts of things that the law did NOT outlaw, and then you say terminology matters?
quote:quote:
none of these weapons were outright banned. In fact it was still legal to manufacture, posses, and sell those exact same weapons during the 1994 AWB
+
If you wanted to buy an AR-15 with bayonet lug, bird cage, pistol grip, and folding stock then you could legally do so.
+
Millions...were legal to buy and possess.
+
Except it was never illegal to own or possess such firearms during the 1994 AWB.
+
Sooner or later you'll figure out that the terminology matters
Does not compute.
You can't be this dense. In order for your argument to make any sense, you would have had to list things that were banned that were not technically defined as 'assault weapons'. You did just the opposite. What did the terminology matter if you could still legally buy half the things on the 'banned' list?
quote:
So a term that can be easily redefined...isn't nebulous?
The term "battle rifle" is nebulous, and has changed over time, but that doesn't make the term bad or wrong. 'Nebulous', maybe, but it is what it is.
I remember back before the 1994 AWB, a semi-auto pistol used to commonly be called an 'automatic' for it's auto-loading function. But then you terminology Nazi's got your panties in a wad, and now we have to call them 'semi-autos'. Same with 'clips'. It used to be perfectly fine to refer to a detachable magazine as a 'clip', but not any more. What's the big fricking deal? Why the obsession with terminology over function? To me, that is being diverted from the real issue. Ultimately, you're being manipulated by the very ideologues you are fighting against.
I get tired of anyone telling me what I can and can't say - whether they be on the left or the right. As a matter of fact, I think I'll go out this weekend and buy me some assault weapons.
Posted on 3/7/14 at 9:21 am to WildTchoupitoulas
No, the only one dense here is you. The terminology matters and if you think it doesn't then explain why anti-gun groups are hiring PR execs to leadership positions. If "assault weapon" is not a nebulous term then explain why its definition changes with political climate and geography. If sure after this thread you'll stick labels on your magazines, calling them "assault clips"
Posted on 3/7/14 at 10:02 am to WildTchoupitoulas
Senator Ted Cruz shows the hypocrisy in the "assault weapons ban" back before it was shut down instead of renewed
action picks up at about the 4:50 mark
action picks up at about the 4:50 mark
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News