Started By
Message

re: Could Hillary's Iraq War Vote Cost Her The Nomination Again?

Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:06 pm to
Posted by Reubaltaich
A nation under duress
Member since Jun 2006
4976 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:06 pm to
quote:

Could Hillary's Iraq War Vote Cost Her The Nomination Again?


Nope.

Age and her health is becoming a huge factor, especially her health.

IF she runs, the left will be fawning all over her, tellings us how she is the 'smartest' woman in the world.

The left doesn't really care about her vote on Eye-rack. They hated Bush with a purple passion(and still do).

Look at the current dufus in the WH. He said he was gonna shut down Gitmo ASAP. Well, its still open. I doubt it will ever be shut-down.

It was all smoke and mirrors from the left.
It always is. Nothin has changed with them.

It was never about Iraq, it was about a man with an R behind his name in the WH.

Blee-dat.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

The left doesn't really care about her vote on Eye-rack.

If this were true, Obama's campaign would have never gotten traction, but the base would have already had their anti-war hero. You right-wingers seem unable to comprehend how big an issue Iraq was in the Democratic primaries, but FYI, it was at least as big as abortion is in the Republican primaries.

quote:

In the 2008 Democratic primary, Iraq, more than the economy, was the paramount issue that framed the contest and sealed the respective fates of the two major candidates vying for the nomination: Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Clinton tried everything to distance herself from the affirmative vote she cast for the Iraq War Resolution of 2002, a resolution that gave President Bush carte blanche in determining when and how to remove the regime in Baghdad. The measure passed both Houses of Congress with strong bipartisan support and put members of Congress on the record less than a month before contentious off-year elections were to take place.

The Democratic primary electorate, however endeared it was to Clinton on other issues, was incredulous at best of Clinton’s election year conversion into an anti-Iraq War crusader. Clinton lost the nomination because of her vote to give President Bush the authorization to use force in Iraq. Obama won the nomination, and subsequently the presidency, largely because of that same vote. The issue that Schweitzer raised deserves to be examined and debated just as rigorously in 2016 as it was in 2008, given that the war, which presently isn’t even close to concluding, resulted in the deaths of more than four thousand U.S. service members, cost over a trillion dollars, exacerbated the volatility of a crucial region for U.S. national interests, gave impetus to Iranian hegemony, introduced Al Qaeda, suicide terrorism, Zarqawism, and sectarian violence in Iraq, eroded American credibility in the world, and led to pervasive, chronic, and ultimately tragic misfortune for the Iraqi populace.


LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram